LAHORE – The Suthra Punjab Agency Lahore (SPAL) deployed its sanitation operational teams across the city on the 9th Muharram-ul-Haram to ensure cleanliness at religious gatherings and along procession routes. According to a press release issued here on Thursday special cleaning measures were undertaken on the routes of the Ashura procession originating from Nisar Haveli, where sanitation workers and machinery remained active to maintain a clean environment for mourners and visitors. SPAL also carried out extensive cleanliness operations during the 983rd annual Ghusl ceremony of Hazrat Data Ganj Bakhsh Ali Hajveri (RA). More than 150 workers participated in the cleanliness operation around Data Darbar, supported by 2 washer vehicles, 3 compactors, 1 mechanical sweeper and 2 loader dumpers. Six supervisors, 2 zonal officers and the town manager personally monitored the operation in the field. Mechanical sweeping was conducted on roads and streets surrounding the Darbar, while pathways leading to the Data Darbar were washed and sprayed with a mixture of phenyl and rose water to maintain hygiene and improve the environment for devotees. On the instructions of Suthra Punjab Authority DG Babar Sahib Din, 10 additional waste containers were installed around the Darbar. Roads, markets and adjoining streets were cleaned and washed, while lime was also sprinkled on routes leading to the Darbar. As part of the Muharram sanitation plan, workers were engaged in manual sweeping and waste clearance in ‘Lakri Mandi’ and Main Bazaar Mochi Gate, while cleanliness measures were also ensured in Mughal Haveli, Taveela Nawab Sahib and Mohalla Shian. 
Waste containers placed along all procession routes were cleared regularly to facilitate mourners and residents. 
DG Babar Sahib Din said all available resources had been utilised to provide a clean and hygienic environment for visitors and devotees. He also thanked citizens for cooperating with Suthra Punjab teams and disposing of waste in designated bins.

LONDON: Singer Zayn Malik is reportedly facing new challenges in his career comeback after claims emerged that he has parted ways with his management, adding to a series of recent setbacks.

The Sun reported, citing a source, that the former One Direction star has split from Zenkai Management, the agency that had managed his career since 2022. The reported departure comes after last year’s alleged fallout involving former bandmate Louis Tomlinson.

According to the report, Zayn isn’t the easiest character to work with and his team stood by him through in all circumstances. However, things reached a point where his management felt they couldn’t do anything else, and they recently resigned. Now Zain is looking for the third manager of his career.

Neither Malik nor Zenkai Management has publicly commented on the reports.

Dispute with Louis Tomlinson

Earlier reports claimed that Zayn Malik and Louis Tomlinson clashed while filming a proposed travel series in 2025.

According to those reports, the show would have followed the former One Direction bandmates on a journey across the United States, where they planned to reflect on their careers, personal lives, and memories from their time in the globally successful boy band.

Perrie Edwards marries Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain in Portugal

The reports alleged that tensions escalated during filming after Malik reportedly became difficult to work with, leading to a heated argument. It was further claimed that Malik remarked on Tomlinson’s late mother, Johannah Deakin, who died of leukaemia in 2016 at the age of 43.

Following the reported dispute, two of Tomlinson’s sisters, Phoebe and Lottie, unfollowed Malik on Instagram.

The reports also alleged that the confrontation turned physical, with sources claiming Malik punched Tomlinson, causing a head injury. However, these allegations have not been independently verified.

WASHINGTON: The U.S. Supreme Court handed President Donald Trump a victory on Thursday by backing the federal government’s authority to turn away asylum seekers when officials deem U.S.-Mexico border crossings too overburdened to handle additional claims.

The court, in a 6-3 ruling powered ​by its conservative justices, overturned a lower court’s finding that the policy violated federal law. The Republican president’s administration has said it may seek to revive the policy, known as “metering,” after it ‌was dropped by Trump’s Democratic predecessor Joe Biden.

The ruling was one of two in immigration-related cases issued by the court on Thursday backing Trump.

The metering policy allowed U.S. immigration officials to stop asylum seekers at the border and indefinitely decline to process their claims. It is separate from a sweeping policy to deny entry to asylum seekers at the border that Trump announced after returning to the presidency last year. That policy also faces an ongoing legal challenge.

Under U.S. law, a migrant who “arrives in the United States” may apply for asylum and ​must be inspected by a federal immigration official. The legal issue in the current case is whether asylum seekers who are stopped on the Mexican side of the border have arrived in the United ​States.

Conservative Justice Samuel Alito, who authored Thursday’s ruling, wrote that the answer is “no.”

US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) resumes asylum claims after halt

“In ordinary speech, no one would say that a person ‘arrives in’ a place — for example, a house, a ⁠city or a country — before the person enters that place,” Alito wrote. “The context in which the phrase ‘arrives in the United States’ is used in the immigration statutes at issue here supports an ordinary-meaning reading.”

‘MORE PEOPLE WILL DIE’

Alito read ​a summary of his opinion from the bench, as is customary. Justice Sonia Sotomayor then read a lengthy summary of her dissenting opinion from the bench — an action that signals a justice’s strong opposition to a ruling.

Sotomayor, in a ​dissent that was joined by fellow liberal justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson, wrote that Thursday’s ruling authorizes U.S. immigration officers to refuse to consider asylum applications by “physically blocking (applicants) from stepping foot onto U.S. soil.”

“The consequences of today’s decision are predictable,” Sotomayor wrote.

“More people will die. More people will attempt to cross the border illegally, and some will make it while others will not. More people will be forced to walk along the U.S.-Mexico border in dangerous conditions, trying to find a port that will inspect them. More ​people will turn back and be subjected to violence because of something they cannot or should not have to change about themselves, such as their race, religion, nationality or political opinion,” Sotomayor wrote.

In an unusual move, Alito then responded ​from the bench to Sotomayor with an additional defense of the ruling, saying there was much more he would have included in his opinion summary had he known that Sotomayor intended to air her dissent in court.

The other immigration-related ruling issued on ‌Thursday also was ⁠authored by Alito. In that one, the court cleared the way for the Trump administration to strip hundreds of thousands of Haitian and Syrian immigrants of a humanitarian status that protects them from deportation. At issue was Temporary Protected Status for more than 350,000 people from Haiti and 6,100 from Syria.

‘AN IMPORTANT TOOL’

James Percival, general counsel at the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, welcomed Thursday’s ruling, saying it “opens up an important tool to continue securing our southern border.”

“We had to go all the way to SCOTUS to vindicate the principle that an alien is not ‘in the United States’ until he is, in fact, in the United States,” Percival said, using shorthand for the Supreme Court of the United States. “We ​have yet AGAIN been vindicated by the Supreme Court.”

Melissa ​Crow, a lawyer representing the plaintiffs, said the ⁠ruling “should sound the alarm for anyone who cares about human rights and the rule of law.”

The ruling, Crow said, “suggests the president may unilaterally override decades of established law and trample on people’s legal rights if doing so suits his political agenda.”

A MIGRANT SURGE

U.S. immigration officials began turning away asylum seekers at the border in 2016 under Democratic former President ​Barack Obama amid a migrant surge. The metering policy was formalized in 2018 during Trump’s first term in office, with border officials authorized to decline processing asylum ​claims when the government decides it ⁠is unable to handle additional applications. Biden rescinded the policy in 2021.

The Trump administration has said it likely would resume metering “as soon as changed border conditions warranted that step,” without providing specifics. Trump has pursued hardline immigration policies since his return to office last year.

The advocacy group Al Otro Lado launched the long-running legal challenge in 2017. The San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in 2024 ruled that federal law requires border agents to inspect all asylum seekers who “arrive” at designated ⁠border crossings, even ​if they have not yet crossed into the United States, and the metering policy violated that obligation.

The Supreme Court also backed Trump in ​several immigration-related rulings issued on an emergency basis since his return to the presidency, including allowing him to deport migrants to countries other than their own and to revoke temporary legal status for hundreds of thousands of Venezuelan immigrants.

The court is expected to rule by around the end of ​June on the legality of Trump’s directive to restrict birthright citizenship in the United States.